> but it's provably false to say it would have run over the pedestrians... You can't prove something like that, I mean consider the irony that you typed this s

> but it's provably false to say it would have run over the pedestrians... You can't prove something like that, I mean consider the irony that you typed this statement right after > It certainly shouldn't have made this maneuver at all How can you prove that it wouldn't have made another unexpected maneuver? It's all speculation, and that's OK. I wish OP used a different title, because everyone seems to be getting hung up on it, when the lede is certainly the FSD being unable to maintain a straight line.