3 ms·
With all due respect to theorists, everyone in particle theory and cosmology is doing this sort of thing. I remember in grad school, cohort-mates down the hall
by noobermin 5y ago
With all due respect to theorists, everyone in particle theory and cosmology is doing this sort of thing. I remember in grad school, cohort-mates down the hall whenever the LHC announced any sort of blip would rush to get a preprint from nothing in a week for the chance to be the one to have made a discovery that fits the discrepancy. One theorist even told me the lack of experiment was "good" because they had space to keep churning nice theory papers without having to worry about being shot down.
Occam's razor suggests to look at explanations that are mundane first. Even beyond dark energy candidates, it looks like Axions are another explanation which is more well established in the theory world (for what that's worth...), so absent more data it's hard to say it's an observation yet without elimination of alternatives.
- phkahler 5y ago>> One theorist even told me the lack of experiment was "good" because they had space to keep churning nice theory papers without having to worry about being shot down. "Scientists" are forgetting the distinction between hypothesis and theory. They're also constantly looking for "new physics" and using the word "novel". Nobody seems to care about using what we have to explain what they see.