3 ms·
A Minimum Viable Test works better when you use Key Risk Indicators (KRIs). KRIs are a lightweight tactic to list your risk estimations, quantify them as possib
by jph 5y ago
A Minimum Viable Test works better when you use Key Risk Indicators (KRIs). KRIs are a lightweight tactic to list your risk estimations, quantify them as possible, and aim for mitigations. KRIs are very useful (in my experience) to accelerate projects because they are quick and easy to write and discuss, and they guide teams toward the best Minimum Viable Tests.
https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/key-risk-indicator https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/key-risk-indicator
- Cilvic 5y agoI clicked through because it sounded interesting (and still does) but without any kind of examples it's hard to get started.
- jph 5y agoThanks, I will add these examples now: System risks e.g. unplanned unavailability count (UU#), mean time to recovery (MTTR) Marketing risks e.g. customer complaint count (CC#), net detractor score (NDS) Financial risks e.g. unbooked letters of intent (LOI$), investment value at risk (VaR$) Process risks e.g. dropout rate (σ), error ratio (ε)
- techsin101 5y agoI think all KRI accomplish is force you think about risk systematically but in terms of actual numbers they are still just guesses.