6 ms·
Looking at the video Tesla was probably not closer than 25 feet from any pedestrians. If pedestrians were closer I think their proximity would make the car st
by antattack 5y ago
Looking at the video Tesla was probably not closer than 25 feet from any pedestrians. If pedestrians were closer I think their proximity would make the car stop as in other videos.
As to abrupt maneuver, EU limits rate of change for steering control and I think it would be wise for US to adopt something similar for driver assist systems.
- zaptrem 5y agoThis makes evasive maneuvers impossible. EU regulations make it impossible for ADAS to even change lanes half the time. Let’s not go down the rabbit hole of government specifying how machines we haven’t even built yet should work.
- antattack 5y agoBecause they are sudden and unpredictable, evasive maneuvers cannot be supervised. It would be unfair to rely on driver to supervise such scenarios. If evasive maneuver is required it would have to be done in fully autonomous way. For the time of the maneuver system would have to be responsible for driving.
- phkahler 5y ago>> As to abrupt maneuver, EU limits rate of change for steering control and I think it would be wise for US to adopt something similar for driver assist systems. That's a terrible idea. First it's a bandaid over an underlying problem. Second it's a legislative answer to a technical problem, which is IMHO never a good idea.
- antattack 5y agoRate limiting is a very valid engineering solution. It's implemented in all kinds of controls. Above everything, the car's driver assist should not be making moves that human does not understand if system requires human to supervise it.
- theslurmmustflo 5y agolike this? https://twitter.com/tripgore/status/1311661887533314048?s=21 https://twitter.com/tripgore/status/1311661887533314048?s=21
- antattack 5y agoThat was when Tesla AP relied on radar which has a hard time detecting styrofoam.
- theslurmmustflo 5y agothis is a model 3, it doesn't have radar.