3 ms·
Sure the raw images are large, but websites rarely display images in their original format. Generally for display on websites images are at least compressed if
by voxic11 5y ago
Sure the raw images are large, but websites rarely display images in their original format. Generally for display on websites images are at least compressed if not scaled down significantly.
Here is an example I just pulled off the front page of the NYT website. I'm sure it was originally a 10+MB image taken on a iphone or DSLR but it was compressed/scaled down to a 510kb webp image for display on the web.
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/09/17/sports/baseball/17milb-somerset-slide-ARVK/17milb-somerset-slide-ARVK-superJumbo.jpg?quality=90&auto=webp https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/09/17/sports/baseball/1...
- jjcm 5y agoThe point here though is there’s a file size limit for images you’re uploading. With the 10MB limit you can’t upload your source image for conversion to the example image you linked. You need to do an initial conversion first, which means you’ll introduce more artifacts.