4 ms·
Shenandoah is keeping pace nicely with ZGC, especially important to make this into the jdk 17 release since that will be what most users target for the next few
by grogers 5y ago
Shenandoah is keeping pace nicely with ZGC, especially important to make this into the jdk 17 release since that will be what most users target for the next few years.
Given the similar feature sets, does anyone with experience running both ZGC and shenandoah have any differentiators?
- rkennke 5y agoThe main difference from user perspective are 1. ZGC doesn't support compressed references (-XX:+UseCompressedOops) which could affect workloads <32GB heap and 2. Shenandoah GC is not available in Oracle builds