5 ms·
You must be new here. I think you’ll be quite disappointed by the rest of HN posts - rarely are they earth shattering.
by yunohn 5y ago
You must be new here. I think you’ll be quite disappointed by the rest of HN posts - rarely are they earth shattering.
- ghego1 5y agoAnd this, for me, is one of the reasons why I keep coming back to HN. In a word were sensational news are the norm, and clickbait titles are everywhere, HN stands out as one of the most reliable and accurate places to find information
- kevin_young 5y agofaggot
- refurb 5y agoActually plenty of HN posts are pretty interesting and offer perspectives that you don’t come across everyday. Not earth shattering, but more than maybe an obvious observation.
- yunohn 5y agoI’m quite tired of reading comments on HN that boil down to “nothing new to see here, why was this posted,…” It’s reductive, boring, and not the goal of a discussion forum. There’s always interesting points to be made, as can be seen from the other comments that tried harder.
- refurb 5y agoI never said it shouldn't be posted, I provided direct criticisms of the blog post content itself. The topic is still interesting, the author's conclusions not so much.
- yunohn 5y ago>> “A company that made a massive, risky investment that was successful has very high margins" > Is this really earth shattering? Here’s your comment in full. What were your “direct criticisms of the blog post content”?
- refurb 5y agoFrom the blog post (I was summarizing). "Moderna grew at a rapid pace while maintaining these huge profit margins"..."Moderna is risky in true sense of the word." I'm not arguing that Moderna isn't an interesting topic, but rather commenting on this part of the blog post. Edit: clearly you can't support your point since you have no rebuttal and just called me a troll?
- yunohn 5y agoEither you’re being dense, or trolling here. Regardless, I have a long standing policy of not feeding trolls, so I’ll stop replying now.