Some of the free software community have long been suspicious of QT. Their recent decision to only provide closed LTS releases seems to justify that. Unless a c

Some of the free software community have long been suspicious of QT. Their recent decision to only provide closed LTS releases seems to justify that. Unless a community with more resources than KDE and less conflicting financial motivation than The QT Company takes it on. I'm sure there are also technical reasons. It's a c++ framework that doesn't bind as well to other languages as GTK.