3 ms·
> But 2 months off could be a totally reasonable amount? Sure. Leave of two months should obviously be coordinated with your leadership, which this person didn
by midev 5y ago
> But 2 months off could be a totally reasonable amount?
Sure. Leave of two months should obviously be coordinated with your leadership, which this person didn't do.
Which makes your comment moot.
- quantumBerry 5y ago>Sure. Leave of two months should obviously be coordinated with your leadership, which this person didn't do. How do you know that individual wasn't approved for the 2 months? I missed that part of the story. Do you not believe an employee has the right to resign from a job, or are they a slave for a certain period of time after taking a vacation?
- midev 5y ago> How do you know that individual wasn't approved for the 2 months? I missed that part of the story. Context clues: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context_(language_use) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context_(language_use) > Do you not believe an employee has the right to resign from a job Of course. Nobody said any different. Are you confused about the thread you're responding to?
- quantumBerry 5y agoI appreciate your honesty that it is complete conjecture on your part that the 2 months hadn't been coordinated.
- midev 5y agoIf that's what you think context clues means, I can't help you.
- randomswede 5y agoBy the fact that the two months of PTO didn't result in an immediate "you are fired for not coming to work", I take the position that it was approved PTO, and (thus) coordinated with (some) management. I do not see any context that supports another interpretation.
- grepfru_it 5y agoAs my dad has always told me, you have no idea what agreement the other employee had with the company, so never speculate.