> It puts the burden on judging what is or isn't protected free speech or hate speach in the hands of actual judges We already have this in the US though. Exis

> It puts the burden on judging what is or isn't protected free speech or hate speach in the hands of actual judges We already have this in the US though. Existing precedent is perfectly clear about what is and isn't permitted speech under the law. But a significant subset of the population isn't happy with the status quo. Hence tech companies censoring things, cancel culture, etc, etc.