4 ms·
That's helpful context. I'm happy to support an open platform that helps creators monetize. For me however, I just need a place to serve videos from.
by reginold 5y ago
That's helpful context. I'm happy to support an open platform that helps creators monetize. For me however, I just need a place to serve videos from.
- LinuxBender 5y agoWell along the lines of h2odragon's comment, you would have to estimate your user-base and calculate what hosting providers can give you the bandwidth you need, or find a CDN that can cache your videos but those get expensive quickly. If you have a small user-base, then just about any VPS provider will do.
- reginold 5y agoBut I'm lazyyyyyyyy come on ;) How much does it cost to host 100 videos that get 1,000 views total per month. $1/month? While I imagine I could set this up, I want easy to use, censorship resistant video hosting for others.
- LinuxBender 5y agovideo hosting for others Well there's the rub. If this was just for you then yes you could get a $1/mo VM, maybe RamNode but there are cheaper ones and just write a script that generates static pages. If you want a platform that others can upload videos to then you are going to need a web application, probably PHP that has a database backend or at least a SQLite DB to map the videos files to the URL's. That could easily put you into the $20 to $40 per month VM. Then you would need something like PeerTube [1] or related software. [1] - https://joinpeertube.org/ https://joinpeertube.org/
- reginold 5y agoAppreciate the thoughtful reply. Ah didn't mean to imply that there's a "platform". I meant more decentralized. A self-hosted YouTube if you will, meaning that creators don't need to do server maintenance and navigate folders, but can simply click upload and post a video to their site. May be beyond the scope of existing tools, but intuitively seems doable.