3 ms·

I believe that, completely. But keyword silently blocking is an objectively bad approach. Tell the sender it failed if you're so keen to do so. Or tag it wit

I believe that, completely. But keyword silently blocking is an objectively bad approach. Tell the sender it failed if you're so keen to do so. Or tag it with a big POTENTIAL SPAM at the beginning of the message and send it. Or literally any of the dozens of smarter ways of content filtering than (if .xyz in y).

Zuider 5y ago
> Tell the sender it failed... But if the sender is a bad actor, they can just keep testing until they succeed, which will make fraud worse.
- account42 5y ago
  Apparently sometimes the sender is not a bad actor.
  - Zuider 5y ago
    Bad actors are why we can't have nice things. Think of how simple, clean and efficient computing would be if we didn't have to keep criminals and idiots at bay.