4 ms·
I don't know, if a military goes rogue, they'll go for the gun owners first. I don't know how many of the contributors here have been to the army, but if you ha
by yawaworht1978 5y ago
I don't know, if a military goes rogue, they'll go for the gun owners first.
I don't know how many of the contributors here have been to the army, but if you have been, you will know that some shotguns and guns won't go far against military arsenals. It might help a bit against police forces, but military? Forget it.
To even compete with a military force, you need coordination and logistics.
And this is one of the reasons why I am against civilian gun carriage:
https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/b9b/49f/034f952656161db66b95ebb454378e732c-Lauren-Boebert.rsquare.w700.jpg https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/b9b/49f/034f952656161db66b95...
I am in Europe and have lived in some LATAM places where everyone, everyone carries a gun or has a couple of them at home, the law be damned.
It's a bit better in the US, as the poverty in the US is not as widespread, but I believe a peaceful society should be without guns, police can have them, military can have them. If that don't work, you need a revolution or run away anyway, and a Glock won't do much there.
- rpmisms 5y ago> if a military goes rogue, they'll go for the gun owners first How? There's no national registry of gun owners. Many new guns are built at home, and the government doesn't know about those at all. You can even 3d print them now, and I don't mean crappy single-shot ones, I mean things like the FGC-9.