4 ms·
I think it quite likely Angola's reporting is broken. Coming up with accurate numbers even for a developed country is challenging. >Furthermore, i find US fasc
by NoImmatureAdHom 5y ago
I think it quite likely Angola's reporting is broken. Coming up with accurate numbers even for a developed country is challenging.
>Furthermore, i find US fascination with their theoretical ability to fight their government with small arms adorable and misguided.
Afghanistan, a fractious nation mostly comprised of illiterate peasants, has been able to fight off not one but two superpowers using mostly small arms.
- InitialLastName 5y agoThe Afghanistan thing is an easy narrative, but it isn't really an accurate one. More accurate: > Two superpowers found that Afghanistan, a fractious nation mostly comprised of illiterate peasants and devoid of exploitable industrial or natural resources, wasn't worth the price of occupying indefinitely.
- Zababa 5y ago> and devoid of exploitable industrial or natural resources Isn't there massive amounts of lithium there?
- InitialLastName 5y agoAIUI, the key word is "exploitable". Natural resources are worthless without the infrastructure to mine them and transport them to somewhere they can be used. Afghanistan, being landlocked, covered in VERY rugged terrain, and with relatively west-hostile neighbors (with lots of their own problems that make "develop port access for Afghanistan" a low priority) is a very difficult geographic place for resource extraction.
- NoImmatureAdHom 5y agoFair! It's a two-variable function though. How much is it worth to have? How much does it cost to keep? The Afghanis made the cost very, very high relative to what might be expected.