5 ms·
That's a useful point. I think economics play a role as well. Specifically, when the economy increases rewards to education and higher-level thinking, the dam
by pbronez 5y ago
That's a useful point.
I think economics play a role as well. Specifically, when the economy increases rewards to education and higher-level thinking, the damage caused by child abuse becomes felt more broadly. It's always been horrible for the individual victims, but it's easier for society to turn a blind eye when it's an easily replaced unskilled child laborer than when it's a young student on a long road to a sophisticated trade.
I think you can see this dynamic in many places. For example, the birthrate goes down when wealth goes up. You invest more in fewer children. That investment includes caring more about ensuring they are treated humanely.
It's always been wrong, but now it's also expensive.
- mensetmanusman 5y agoAgreed, bit for the notion that parents with more children would care less per child: As a parent with multiple children, there seems to be a network effect, because you see them interact more with one another as a group, so the caring compounds.