3 ms·
> Meanwhile many disadvantaged workers - who are employed with short-term contracts[1] (or very often without contract[2], which is wide spread even though that
by peoplefromibiza 5y ago
> Meanwhile many disadvantaged workers - who are employed with short-term contracts[1] (or very often without contract[2], which is wide spread even though that is technically illegal) are not unionised.
Not to defend Italian unions, that have their fault, but:
Of course workers working illegally are not unionized, that doesn't mean they have no protection at all.
Italy is well known for having a subsidy for everything, including unoccupied people, who earn money from the State and from their illegal job.
Anyway, short-term workers are protected by unions, I know for sure at least CGIL has a department devolved to temporary workers or people working part time or on a short-term contract.
In Italy even cab drivers have their own unions! (plural!)
- mastazi 5y ago> Anyway, short-term workers are protected by unions, I know for sure at least CGIL has a department devolved to temporary workers But they are generally less likely to unionise i.e. the percentage of temporary workers who are union members is lower compared to long term contract workers. I’m not saying this is necessarily the union’s fault, and of course I agree with you that it would be nearly impossible for illegal workers to unionise, however the fact remains that unions don’t generally represent the most disadvantaged groups. I have to say though that the Amazon deal is a sign that things are changing. The unions that I remember would have strongly opposed the possibility of Amazon entering the Italian market, let alone making a deal with them.
- pjmlp 5y agoMany peoplet that are unlikely to unionized aren't even aware of their work rights per law, the basic stuff they aren't actually obliged to do, but they do it anyway thanks to their lack of knowledge, and fear to lose their job.