3 ms·
What you say makes sense. But some of these people are really poor. Among the "racist" people in the US, many are actually "classist". That also runs high in I
by rg111 5y ago
What you say makes sense. But some of these people are really poor.
Among the "racist" people in the US, many are actually "classist". That also runs high in Indian society.
In my experience Christians are much more forward thinking and secular than other minorities in India. They live peacefully and blend very well with the Hindus. Even most of their names, outside of Goa, Mumbai, etc., are derived from Sanskrit, Tamil, Bengali roots depending on the region. A lot of Indian Christians will have only one name, i.e. middle name or first name identifying their Christian identity. Sometimes they often just ommit the Christian part except in official documents.
Anyway, this is a good sign totally as you say, but that is true in prosperous regions and/or households.
For backward regions and poor families, I am not sure if people will even let them hold religious offices.
Btw, even Christians can claim backward castes benefits if their ancestors happened to belong to a so called lower caste when they were not Christians.
- foolinaround 5y ago> In my experience Christians are much more forward thinking and secular than other minorities in India. Sadly, not by much. Indian Christians have adopted many of the vices of the West ( the rates of divorce among Indian Christians are higher than Indians), but in terms of a broader outlook, I have seen this only in the sub-category of those living in big cities, and predominantly english-speaking and educated. The Christians in rural areas continue to hold on to caste, despite all efforts. In some ways, the Church structures themselves are casteist, and bar people from being part of it.