Does your argument boil down to 'just because risk is currently low, it is acceptable to make a change that is known to increase risk'? What if currently risk i

Does your argument boil down to 'just because risk is currently low, it is acceptable to make a change that is known to increase risk'? What if currently risk is low simply due to not making that change. Doesn't make sense. Or are you saying suicidal ideation cannot be correlated to anything other than age? Which is also untrue since we have evidence social media (and other factors) can increase this risk.