3 ms·
Yes. The writer was clearly referring to the practices which were explicitly condoned by that organization. The organization was not literally a government, but
by tshaddox 5y ago
Yes. The writer was clearly referring to the practices which were explicitly condoned by that organization. The organization was not literally a government, but the term still makes perfect sense when referring to the governance of an organization. The writer’s point was that being critical of other languages was not simply something that happened in practice, but was an explicitly condoned behavior.
- dustintrex 5y agoNo, they were saying the practice is demanded by custom, which is precisely what de rigueur means. There is no organization of snobby Pythonistas etc mandating that its members make fun of PHP, and even if there was, de jure wouldn't make any sense. Quite the opposite, in fact, since it was de facto required to be critical of PHP.