3 ms·
> Given that children have attenuated rights in basically every society Just because something is true does not mean that it should be true. > What “savory” a
by jfrunyon 5y ago
> Given that children have attenuated rights in basically every society
Just because something is true does not mean that it should be true.
> What “savory” actions for which a minor would use E2EE are you concerned are jeopardized by such a proposal?
Why does it matter whether their actions are savory or not? There are many things that reality tells us children are going to do, whether it's "savory" or not. And a lot of those things probably shouldn't be exposed to interception.
- burnished 5y agoChildren aren't responsible enough to.. well.. take responsibility for their actions. That is what you are arguing against.
- ummwhat 5y agoWhen it's inconvenient, "children aren't capable of adult responsibility". When it's inconvenient in the other direction, "this court has decided to have you tried as an adult."
- burnished 5y agoIts not clear what your statement is supposed to mean. Are you asking me to take personal responsibility for times where minors are tried as adults and we'd both see it as an injustice? Cause, I got beef with the judiciary, but I don't see how thats germane to the topic right here.
- jfrunyon 5y agoHuh? First off, who are you to tell me what I'm arguing for or against? Second, "children" covers an EXTREMELY wide range of maturities. Some children are absolutely responsible enough to take responsibility for their actions. Third, what on earth does that have to do with allowing anyone who feels like it to intercept their conversations?