4 ms·
About a year ago wee started design on a large project for one of our clients . Think in terms of something like a full size passenger aircraft motion simulato
by robomartin 5y ago
About a year ago wee started design on a large project for one of our clients . Think in terms of something like a full size passenger aircraft motion simulator...so, something 100 feet long and 21 feet wide. Well, needless to say, lots of metal makes-up the entire structure.
We had to design this thing twice due to fluctuations in metal pricing. The original design was all aluminum. Then came all steel, because aluminum became far more expensive than steel. Then a hybrid and now steel only. There are other factors, such as the relative cost of TIG vs. MIG welding, yet, when your material costs increase nearly four-fold you can't ignore it.
By the time we finished a reduced scope prototype materials pricing and availability was just insane. This has affected other components, like fasteners.
At this time, any quote we provide for product development --be it electronics, mechanical or both-- includes language to say that we cannot hold pricing on anything for more than one week. It's got to be that crazy. If you are not very careful you can easily end-up being very busy while losing money.
- withinboredom 5y agoI can’t imagine that redesign. The difference between the density/mass of aluminum and steel, plus the difference of inertia the software would have to account for. That must have been a lot of work for everyone!
- robomartin 5y agoBecause the structure is regular it was relatively easy to scale elements based on both FEA and actual testing. We use table various parametric design techniques in Solidworks in almost every project. The power of this approach is in the speed of iterations when design parameters change. Of course, it took years of fine tuning and experience to develop the right way to approach projects this way.