3 ms·
That's just arguing on semantics and deliberately ignoring the context. No one is arguing that there is literally no land to put a single building on anywhere i
by SilverRed 5y ago
That's just arguing on semantics and deliberately ignoring the context. No one is arguing that there is literally no land to put a single building on anywhere in the country.
Obviously when people say land is scarce, they mean that the useful land that people actually want to live on is scarce.
Having a billion square km of sand in the desert isn't useful when someone wants to buy a place to live and exist in a society.
- seoulmetro 5y agoYes. And they're wrong. Land is not scarce. No one is mentioning the "sand". There's more space empty with perfect soil than there is space taken up by residential. The outback has nothing to do with it.