3 ms·
For google-ability did you really need to occupy Oil Shell when Shell Oil is very much already a thing?
by munk-a 5y ago
For google-ability did you really need to occupy Oil Shell when Shell Oil is very much already a thing?
- notriddle 5y agoSeems like search engines are smart enough to distinguish them. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=oil+shell https://duckduckgo.com/?q=oil+shell
- bscphil 5y agoI can't tell if you're joking, all of the results except the top one show "Shell oil" results for me. Not hard to imagine that this impacts searchability if you're looking for something specific.
- booleandilemma 5y agoI wonder if people will end up googling it as oillang (or even oilang), similar to what happened with golang.
- ironmagma 5y agoWouldn’t it be oillang?
- leoc 5y agoLet's hope so, because 'oil language' is also going to be problematic: https://www.google.com/search?q=oil+language https://www.google.com/search?q=oil+language https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langues_d%27o%C3%AFl https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langues_d%27o%C3%AFl . I came here half-expecting an article about medieval French.
- ketralnis 5y agoA metric by which the optimal language is AmbidextrousScallywag