3 ms·
> the long term effects of mRNA "vaccines" are unknown entirely. This is just such an absurd scientific and immunologically ignorant answer that I see get trot
by robbiep 5y ago
> the long term effects of mRNA "vaccines" are unknown entirely.
This is just such an absurd scientific and immunologically ignorant answer that I see get trotted out again and again that I need to respond.
The mRNA vaccine is literally a scientific miracle.
We introduce a piece of RNA, which is basically in the form of the RNA that viruses use to hijack the protein generating machinery of our cells, in order to produce an antigen our immune system can respond to without the runaway potential of an actual infection.
The mRNA is broken down, antigen production stops, and our immune system is primed against a new foreign and potentially deadly pathogen.
There is no conceivable mechanism for long term effects (and here I am responding to claims around impotence, infertility, ‘changing your Genome’) - you’re literally just getting the immunological benefits of antigen stimulation without having to go through an infection. It’s Nobel prize winning. Just because it’s new doesn’t mean it isn’t highly well understood and characterised. It’s such an ignorant statement it literally hurts
- platonis 5y agoIf it was so simple there wouldn't be myocarditis
- titzer 5y agoSome people have bad reactions to Tylenol.
- angelzen 5y agoGiven that there has been at least one disastrous vaccination campaign, leading to super-hot variants with 100% death rate in unvaccinated poultry (thankfully poultry!), I would advise toning down the language a bit. Nobody has a crystal ball. We are running a vaccination campaign for a novel virus based on a novel technology and we'll only know the final outcome in a decade or two. Why does this matter? Perhaps it's not wise to mRNA vaccinate against every infectious disease under the Sun until the dust settles on the covid campaign. Hold that Nobel Prize for a while.