4 ms·
You pay the storage cost in S3 as well, depending on tier Snowflake will not necessarily be a cost savings from compute either. Redshift could really use some e
by atwebb 5y ago
You pay the storage cost in S3 as well, depending on tier Snowflake will not necessarily be a cost savings from compute either. Redshift could really use some elasticity beyond a factor of 2 and some warm resume features.
- glogla 5y agoJust to clarify, I meant Redshift ra3 storage costs as much as s3, so you're not saving much by keeping things in s3 instead of in Redshift. Although I don't know how Redshift compression compares to something like gzipped parquet. Maybe the data ends up taking more space and thus money. Agreed on that elasticity.