5 ms·
> [Software] is not a device. Then what are you engineering? --- Edit to elaborate: I'm convinced this is the essence of the debate that has intensified as
by Terretta 5y ago
> [Software] is not a device.
Then what are you engineering?
---
Edit to elaborate:
I'm convinced this is the essence of the debate that has intensified as parts that move at the speed of light are devouring physical parts.
Switch, transistor, if statement -- a maker should be able to convert one type of part to another type of part without losing their rights, or accidentally triggering a "oh, look, general computing, therefore it's no longer up to you to decide!" flag of some sort.
Ease of reconfiguring electrons shouldn't change right to design and distribute a product with whatever blend of physical and digital one wants, facilitating whatever purpose one wants, and not being forced to facilitate other purposes.
- jacquesm 5y agoSorry, but you really can't just define some arbitrary alternative universe and then expect the debate to take place on your terms.
- Terretta 5y agoI think your universe is the alternate, clinging to the antiquated notion a device can’t be digital or a blend of mechanical and digital widgetry. That’s so last century. :-)