3 ms·
> IPFS [...] relies mostly on centralizing gateways to actually let people access content No, IPFS does not need gateways: they are conveniences for people tha
by imglorp 5y ago
> IPFS [...] relies mostly on centralizing gateways to actually let people access content
No, IPFS does not need gateways: they are conveniences for people that don't have ipfs:// support in their browser or run a local daemon.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ipfs-companion/nibjojkomfdiaoajekhjakgkdhaomnch https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ipfs-companion/nib...
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ipfs-companion https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ipfs-companio...
https://brave.com/ipfs-support https://brave.com/ipfs-support
- superkuh 5y agoThat's exactly what I said. I don't appreciate you twisting my words to make a point. No one has IPFS support. I have some IRC friends that are big in to it and they always link the gateways because no one can access their content otherwise.
- imglorp 5y agoYeah, but not no one. It's native in Brave and Opera Touch now. At some point those ^ extensions should be folded into mainstream browsers unless Big Content pushes against it.