I found this GitHub issue/comment really fascinating: "Hi. I'm Jean-Denis Vauguet, one of the maintainers of ruby-lang.org (working on the French flavour). Af

I found this GitHub issue/comment really fascinating: "Hi. I'm Jean-Denis Vauguet, one of the maintainers of ruby-lang.org (working on the French flavour). After discussing a little bit with other active VIT members, it seems I stepped up to port ruby-lang.org to a git-based, static website generation process too. I'm using Jekyll, extended with custom tasks for generating, parsing, Sass compiling, multi-lang support… I'm also in contact with postmodern, who started its own port a few days ago (idea: merging good ideas and focus on one project). So there is kind of a "official" effort going on, despite we did not published yet (hopefully soon). In the mean time, your port looks great :) But I do see it is not quite a "port", but an overhaul, with a different organization (links to third-party websites, for instance). I can't speak for the Ruby officials, for I'm not, but I do see this may result in a duplicated effort, and a confusing "content-hydra" (two websites with the same name, newcomers puzzled, duplicated content, etc.). So what should we do about it?" https://github.com/rubylang/rubylang.github.com/issues/4 https://github.com/rubylang/rubylang.github.com/issues/4 It would be interesting to see how a major site like ruby-lang.org being managed and run through git would turn out.