4 ms·
Perhaps the sub-clause is redundant there? 'The problem was named after an incident in 1996 in which AOL's profanity filter prevented residents of the town of
by iechoz6H 5y ago
Perhaps the sub-clause is redundant there?
'The problem was named after an incident in 1996 in which AOL's profanity filter prevented residents of the town of Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, England, from creating accounts with AOL, because the town's name contains the substring "cunt".'
- nobody9999 5y ago>'The problem was named after an incident in 1996 in which AOL's profanity filter prevented residents of the town of Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, England, from creating accounts with AOL, because the town's name contains the substring "cunt".' Right. Regardless of the specific pattern matching function, in both cases, the results were both incorrect and unwanted. Which is why I consider this instance to be a variation on the same issue.