3 ms·
>and tells all kinds of lies to reporters about who he is and why he's there And also asking reporters' takes on Elizabeth Holmes, and then trying to "correct"
by filoleg 5y ago
>and tells all kinds of lies to reporters about who he is and why he's there
And also asking reporters' takes on Elizabeth Holmes, and then trying to "correct" them by saying that everyone just copypastes the initial story, and no one has told the real truth behind Theranos (implying that Elizabeth is innocent and gets blamed unfairly).
Keep in mind, those weren't random reporters, those were reporters who were lining up to be juries on the trial. I think it is pretty newsworthy that one of the accused parties' family members decided to mislead potential juries under a fake identity outside of the courthouse.
- cma 5y agoAre you sure they weren't there reporting on the jury selection? A bunch of reporters lining up to be juries on the trial while writing articles on it? That doesn't make any sense.
- chihuahua 5y agoI don't think the reporters were going to be jurors. I read the article again and it doesn't say that, as far as I can tell.
- filoleg 5y agoApologies, I've re-read it again, and it seems like I completely misinterpreted the line where it said "Over the course of two days of jury selection, he gabbed with reporters standing in line to get in the courthouse". Now that I am re-reading it, it definitely seems like I've made a bad assumption there.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]