3 ms·
I missed your link in the parent - if there's plenty of evidence that getting the vaccine is actually more risky for a certain group than not getting it, sure,
by jowday 5y ago
I missed your link in the parent - if there's plenty of evidence that getting the vaccine is actually more risky for a certain group than not getting it, sure, let's avoid giving them the vaccine. It should be obvious that when I say "willingly unvaccinated" I mean people who aren't at risk or have a condition that prevents them from getting vaccinated who refuse it.
>If you're not simply ignorant to history and being tricked by the narrative, at least be honest about what you actually want - which is to control others.
I want to keep myself and my loved ones safe - I've got 3 different family members who are both vulnerable to COVID and require in-home care. It's not feasible for them to self-isolate.
- michaelmrose 5y agoVirtually nobody is at higher risk from vaccination than the disease.
- throwawayfear 5y agohttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/10/boys-more-at-risk-from-pfizer-jab-side-effect-than-covid-suggests-study https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/10/boys-more-at-r... https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/101-child-population-by-age-group https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/101-child-popul... That's 25 million people in the USA alone, and that's just based on the data we have right now. Virtually no one? And you ignore that the people with antibodies from natural immunity don't need it. See the links in the parent comments I posted.