4 ms·
and why stop there? Introduce lazy evaluation, type classes, custom operator overloading and what not... I'm jesting of course, I find JavaScript already too c
by throw_m239339 5y ago
and why stop there? Introduce lazy evaluation, type classes, custom operator overloading and what not...
I'm jesting of course, I find JavaScript already too complicated, it's like some people want to make it look like Scala... just no.
- dtech 5y agoI'm mainly puzzled why they want to introduce additional syntax specific for it, when higher order function are perfectly possible in the current language already and integrate well with the F#-style pipe.
- abecedarius 5y agoVery reasonable, and that's why I phrased it like "if we do this". A TC39 member on this topic of restraint and priorities: https://erights.medium.com/the-tragedy-of-the-common-lisp-why-large-languages-explode-4e83096239b9 https://erights.medium.com/the-tragedy-of-the-common-lisp-wh...
- nsonha 5y ago> I find JavaScript already too complicated I get that you don't want it *to become* complicated, but as it currently is, JavaScript is still a rather simple language.