> That part Apple does get right. In the sense that they don't bother, by those standards. AFAIK Apple's watch that does everything is virtually comparable to

> That part Apple does get right. In the sense that they don't bother, by those standards. AFAIK Apple's watch that does everything is virtually comparable to the "watch that looks good" in its running analytics, cycling features, swimming connectivity, etc. Put another way, the mid-tier and above running-focused Garmin devices (can't speak for the other sports) should not be considered to be in the same class as an Apple watch for running.