>"A few random people on rose Twitter? Seriously, that is the best you can find? Thanks for proving my point for me. " So I'll re-quote the parent comment you

>"A few random people on rose Twitter? Seriously, that is the best you can find? Thanks for proving my point for me. " So I'll re-quote the parent comment you made: >"NO ONE was calling it 'the Trump vaccine.' No one." Emphasis on the 'NO ONE', that you asserted in all caps and then bothered to repeat as it's own sentence. I literally just provided you two examples of people on the left insinuating as such. >"Seriously, that is the best you can find?" I suppose pundits and left-leaning influencers who regularly reach the top of the trending feed on Twitter don't count. Would you rather I find nobodies? I would dredge up quotes from columnists or campaign trail statements that allude to the vaccine being untrustworthy because of it's association with Donald Trump, but I sense you're just going to ignore them and further proclaim that I've proved your point - somehow.