3 ms·
IANAL either but my understanding was that the "meeting of the minds", is not just that a mutual understanding that contract exists but there is an agreement on
by JackFr 5y ago
IANAL either but my understanding was that the "meeting of the minds", is not just that a mutual understanding that contract exists but there is an agreement on basis of the contract.
In so far as it relates to Eth, my point was that the meeting of the minds only goes as far as "the code is the contract", and the use case is to eliminate the civil courts combing over intent and who knew what.