4 ms·
>Higher orbit junk is what really matters, and will require much more delta-v to reach, and then again to de-orbit after "docking". Wait, why? The lower orbit
by vsareto 5y ago
>Higher orbit junk is what really matters, and will require much more delta-v to reach, and then again to de-orbit after "docking".
Wait, why? The lower orbit stuff traverses less space so it's easier to make it more dense and hazardous to space travel through that space.
- jmcomets 5y agoWith my very basic understanding of orbital mechanics, higher orbits require more dV simply because it's further from Earth. The more interesting bit is that subtle orbital adjustments require much less dV in higher orbits than in lower ones. I like to think of it like pushing a barrel uphill: it takes more effort if the slope is steep, but then once it's up there, it's a lot easier to get the barrel moving downhill. Anyways, the "de-orbit" cost follows the same rule of higher being more costly in dV, the big difference with an ascension being that the atmosphere slowing you down is what you want (aerobraking is the word, I think?). So the difference in dV between a high orbit and a low orbit descent isn't proportionate to that of the ascent, if that makes any sense.
- Ajedi32 5y agoLow orbit stuff gets naturally de-orbited after a few years/decades by stray air molecules from the Earth's atmosphere, so there's little point to manually cleaning it. Debris in higher orbits can take centuries or millennia to naturally de-orbit, so manual cleaning there makes more sense.