4 ms·

> Is it to protect the vaccinated? Unfortunately, yes. The unvaccinated are a fertile ground for strains to develop. Protecting the unvaccinated is in your own

> Is it to protect the vaccinated? Unfortunately, yes. The unvaccinated are a fertile ground for strains to develop. Protecting the unvaccinated is in your own best interest. We're going to need new vaccines when the the virus evolves in the unvaccinated, but the vaccinated can delay that eventuality.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
SV_BubbleTime 5y ago
Do you know about ADE? People with a vaccine that doesn’t stop infection may have a higher chance and time to help develop mutations in order for it to survive. It was extremely dangerous to push an imperfect vaccine, and because we know the current ones do not stop infection, transmission, or lower the viral load, that might be what has happened. IDK, not an epidemiologist. https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/antibody-dependent-enhancement-and-vaccines https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-cent...
- cthalupa 5y ago
  Your own link says that there is zero evidence of ADE being an issue with CV19 and our vaccines.
  - jaz2130 5y ago
    Luc Montagnier, a Nobel Prize winner, is quite concerned about ADE and these vaccines creating mutations. He’s also unvaccinated.
    - zamalek 5y ago
      So what? There are many more Nobel Prize winners who are vaccinated. Brilliance doesn't make you immune to stupidity.