4 ms·
Alternatively: This is such a (potentially) big change, it's important to get right. I'd be disappointed if an inadequately-baked solution gets rushed in. Anot
by stickfigure 5y ago
Alternatively: This is such a (potentially) big change, it's important to get right. I'd be disappointed if an inadequately-baked solution gets rushed in.
Another way of looking at it: This is fundamentally just a performance optimization. Java performance is already exceptional for most of Java's popular use cases (business processing). While valuable, I don't think this one feature is quite as important as you consider it.
- deepsun 5y agoThat makes sense, given the fact that they made "new Foo()" pretty lightweight anyway (for CPU, not for RAM).