3 ms·
Sure, but that's not the point is it? What you describe is already easily covered by a general law against treason, in that they joined a war effort against the
by andrepd 5y ago
Sure, but that's not the point is it? What you describe is already easily covered by a general law against treason, in that they joined a war effort against their country.
The point here is the "confidential information" bit.
- AmericanChopper 5y agoThe parent comment is about the concept of citizenship revocation in general.
- qwerty456127 5y agoTreason itself is a slippery, morally obsolete (probably coming from the feudal ages) concept which I wouldn't apply to people who have been born a citizen, never asked for that in their sane age, never volunteered to join the country military or civil services or signed up for access to secret documents.