3 ms·
>when it had weapon grade materials as a side product Completely untrue BS, please get informed better: https://theconversation.com/debunking-myths-on-nuclear
by nix23 5y ago
>when it had weapon grade materials as a side product
Completely untrue BS, please get informed better:
https://theconversation.com/debunking-myths-on-nuclear-power-its-not-for-making-bombs-20013 https://theconversation.com/debunking-myths-on-nuclear-power...
>>Historically, if a country wants to produce a nuclear bomb, they build reactors especially for the job of making plutonium, and ignore civilian power stations.
B Reactor:
https://www.hanford.gov/page.cfm/BReactor https://www.hanford.gov/page.cfm/BReactor
- Tade0 5y agoThe side products might well be "people competent in running such a facility". Why was Iran's "civilian" nuclear program always seen as nothing more than smokescreen?
- nix23 5y ago>Why was Iran's "civilian" nuclear program always seen as nothing more than smokescreen? It's a bit more complicated, especially since trump ended the contract (which included to control Iran's program) https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/09/18/440567960/born-in-the-u-s-a-how-america-created-irans-nuclear-program?t=1631735620253 https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/09/18/440567960/...