14 ms·
You're right for the 10nm (7nm) process development. They focused on shrinking the wrong parts and ended up with an inferior product. Instead of changing direct
by starfallg 5y ago
You're right for the 10nm (7nm) process development. They focused on shrinking the wrong parts and ended up with an inferior product. Instead of changing direction, they doubled down.
- galangalalgol 5y agoWas this a case of a leader refusing to be wrong, or engineers thinking "we almost have this, give us another shot."
- GuuD 5y agoI have no idea, but isn’t it the usual real-world case of “it’s complicated, and it’s both”?