3 ms·
That's not a valid comparison. Nuclear energy accounts only for a much smaller amount of energy production. It's a very weak argument to just wave your hand ov
by bayesian_horse 5y ago
That's not a valid comparison. Nuclear energy accounts only for a much smaller amount of energy production.
It's a very weak argument to just wave your hand over how to multiply nuclear energy by one or two orders of magnitude, without major incidents, without nuclear pollution, and without the nuclear waste problem getting more out of hand than it already has.