I didn't necessarily assume an anti-Google tone, but I did mutter "what the hell?" when I read "Glad no one appears hurt, but this is a good reminder of one of

I didn't necessarily assume an anti-Google tone, but I did mutter "what the hell?" when I read "Glad no one appears hurt, but this is a good reminder of one of the main reasons Google’s experiment with robot cars both fascinates us and creeps us out.". If it was human error, 160K miles have been logged without incident... how the hell is this a good reminder of why we should be creeped out by Google's experiment? (edit: The last sentence of that last paragraph is equally useless.) I'm no journalist but I feel comfortable rolling my eyes at this article and its style.