There was an interesting quote under one of the replies: > The power of rust is that it's for the people... not for massive orgs to wield in order to make more

There was an interesting quote under one of the replies: > The power of rust is that it's for the people... not for massive orgs to wield in order to make more money Given that most rust code is licensed under non-copyleft licenses (MIT, etc.) I wonder where this impression came from? I have always had the impression that rust was exactly that - just another tool for massive orgs to make more money. In contrast, a language ecosystem more like elisp, where most code is GPLed seems more "for the people".