3 ms·
> who read 320TB of text When you said "less data", you did not specify the type of data. > Could it play chess based on a text description of the game? We d
by lostmsu 5y ago
> who read 320TB of text
When you said "less data", you did not specify the type of data.
> Could it play chess based on a text description of the game?
We don't know - nobody tried it yet. We tried with 320TB text only.
> If we fed a few years worth of video an audio to a neural network, could it write War and Peace?
As Sonny from "I, robot" said, "can you?"
- 0-_-0 5y ago>you did not specify the type of data. Obviously, it has to be the same data to make a comparison. > We don't know - nobody tried it yet. How would you even train a network unsupervised so that it can play chess from a text description? Nobody knows. That's the point. >"can you?" That doesn't matter, Tolstoy could, therefore it's within human capability.
- lostmsu 5y ago> Obviously, it has to be the same data to make a comparison. No, it is very much not obvious. There's quite a bit of research showing models, that receive X samples of type A and Y samples on type B might be better in tasks on A, than models that are trained just on X.