19 ms·
I'm not outraged at all. Where did you get this from? I was asking for details because everything has been very vague.
by gtirloni 5y ago
I'm not outraged at all. Where did you get this from? I was asking for details because everything has been very vague.
- CRConrad 5y agoThere are no more details to be had -- nor needed. It's very simple: If you find the mere fact that one organisation is amassing an apparently undue amount of influence something to be worried about, then be; if you don't, then don't. The fact that you're obviously trying to paint a legitimate worry as overwrought histrionics by spelling "worried" as "outraged" would seem to indicate you're already leaning towards the latter -- perhaps sufficiently so to be intentionally trying to ridicule the original worry.