3 ms·
I wonder if GitHub will step in and maintain. Isn't it still a built-in part of their pages stack? Even if there isn't new feature development, if it's part of
by mfer 5y ago
I wonder if GitHub will step in and maintain. Isn't it still a built-in part of their pages stack? Even if there isn't new feature development, if it's part of their stack they should step in and maintain it.
You don't want bitrot to introduce vulnerabilities through unmaintained publicly exposed things in your stack.
- sam1r 5y agoRight. They (gh) should creative a relief team that handles repositories with very high stars, and no active maintenance.
- mfer 5y agoI'm not suggesting they do that. GH pages is includes jekyll. It's a feature of their product. I would expect them to maintain that as long as jekyll is part of their feature suite. I'm only bringing them up because it impacts their product directly. https://docs.github.com/en/pages/setting-up-a-github-pages-site-with-jekyll/creating-a-github-pages-site-with-jekyll https://docs.github.com/en/pages/setting-up-a-github-pages-s...
- jaredcwhite 5y agoAKAIK, they apply (or backport) security fixes to the Jekyll 3.x branch. No word on if they ever plan to migrate to Jekyll 4 or beyond.
- HomeDeLaPot 5y agoI can't say if the article was ninja edited, but it specifically addresses this.