3 ms·
Well here's one thing: they tend to cite sources. Do you have any actual data on your assertion? What you "fail to see" is merely a statement of your observatio
by sophacles 5y ago
Well here's one thing: they tend to cite sources. Do you have any actual data on your assertion? What you "fail to see" is merely a statement of your observation skills. I would like to compare that with other sources that aren't so clearly biased.
- bvhg3 5y agoPrimary source: "persons familiar with the matter".
- sophacles 5y agoAhh, well I don't know or care who would be familiar with your observation skills. Im asking for data, do you have that or not?
- elzbardico 5y agoYeah, I've got it. Citing the source is kind of basic. But, by itself, alone, it doesn't amount to much, if they can't even keep fidelity to the original source, if they can't even begin to understand the content they are citing. And this thing happens all the time.
- sophacles 5y agoCan you provide data about this? Can you provide data over time - like is this a new thing? Until then you are just doing the same thing as the parent: making a bunch of unsubstantiated claims based on what can only be labeled as "your own bias". I'd think that you "media hater" folks would act differently than you are. Like you claim to hate the media for misrepresenting the truth, but then refuse to actually back up your claims with any real data. If it wasn't so sad, it would be funny.