>policy that demands no action be taken If that's to be changed, who takes the action? The government? Does the government decide what's bad, and what's not? I

>policy that demands no action be taken If that's to be changed, who takes the action? The government? Does the government decide what's bad, and what's not? It's an unanswerable question that none agrees on. Society hasn't worsened meaningfully, this kind of stuff has always existed, but the internet exposes this to everyone, pulling everyone out of their pre-internet bubbles.