And "...record high rights of CO2 emissions..." I hate that the headline, which they know is the only thing a lot of people read, implies "high prices due to e

And "...record high rights of CO2 emissions..." I hate that the headline, which they know is the only thing a lot of people read, implies "high prices due to eolic/renewables", when the true underlying cause is that gas and coal cost a lot more than 5 years ago. And they left the "abundant wind power has at times led to periods of cheap electricity" to the bottom of the article, where nobody would read it. I guess some people would rather pay $100 every month of the year than $150 one month and $30 the other 12.